VIDEO: The REAL Road We've Traveled - Obama for "Former President"

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Obama & Co. recently released a propaganda film masquarading as a documentary making the increadible argument that Obama was dealt a bad hand by the bad economy, but that he did a good job these last 4 years.

Some enterprising film-maker decided to set the record straight and fill in a few of the finer points that Obama's little campaign film failed to mention.


Comparing Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, Shirtless

Sunday, March 18, 2012

While comparing the physiques of the current GOP nominees may seem shallow and irrelevant to some, I would disagree.  Maintaining a healthy weight and build takes a good deal of self-denial, sustained effort and long-term vision.  Wouldn't you rather have a president with these traits, so rare in our society today?

Newt Gingrich



Rick Santorum



Ron Paul




Mitt Romney


Hope for Change: Getting Obama Out

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Conservatives need to get their act together if they want to say
goodbye to Obama in 2012.

In following this Republican primary it's easy to get the idea that Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich don't really know what their doing.  How else do you explain the fact that they weren't even on the ballot in several counties in Alabama and Michigan, and the whole state of Virginia.  What kind of campaign can't figure out how to qualify to be included on the ballot?!!

And what kind of candidate celebrates a "huge" victory on a night that they slip behind in the delegate race?  That's right on Tues March 13th, while Santorum was lauding his paper-thin victories in Alabama and Mississippi, Romney quietly picked up 41 delegates with his wins in Hawaii and American Samoa beating out Santorum's highly-publicized 35 delegate win.

Santorum simply is not paying attention; he is too focused on winning a handful of states favorable to him and does not realize that all the time Romney has charted his way around to secure the nomination.  Look on any delegate chart and notice something: every single state Santorum won has also awarded delegates to Romney, often almost as much as to Santorum.  Now look at Romney's column.  He has won each and every winner-take-all state, giving him a 219 delegate lead from these states alone.  And, he is poised to win the remaining winner-take-all states as well including California's whopping 172 delegates. 

If nothing else, it should be clear that Romeny has done his homework over the last several years while Santorum and Gingrich have been flying by the seat of their pants.  Romney has thought of everything: plotting multiple scenarios, secured funding, recruited local support, used media power as necessary, and consulted with all the experts he needs to ensure that he wins this primary and then the general.  Why do you think he has become the so-called "institutional favorite?" 

The Republican Party does not care so much who wins as long as it is from their party.  You think they care at all for Romney's ideas and policies?  If so, you have gotten caught up in the campaign rhetoric.   The reason Romney is surging and will become the nominee is because his is shrewd, organized, disciplined and bold.  Take Florida for example, he has in real danger of losing the contest to Gingrich, but he took the bold step of spending millions on exposing Gingrich's many past faults to the public eye and it paid off: they broke for Romney in droves. 

If making a political statement (and then losing) is what Conservatives want to do in 2012, then perhaps Santorum or Gingrich may be our man.  But if beating Obama is what we want, then we must have Mitt Romney, the only man with the campaign discipline, craftiness, and ability to call up financial and man-power support.  Santorum and his campaign have made blunder after blunder: Obama, the democrats and the media will eat him alive.  Gingrich has too many contradictory liabilities: a personal history of loose financials and morals and an ethics violation conviction in the House to quickly render anything he says hypocritical.  Romney has an impeccably moral family life, and the real-life business experience to fix everything that's wrong with the economy today.

As a final note, Gingrich's apparent plan to prevent Romney from securing the needed 1144 delegates and causing a "brokered convention" at the Aug. 27-30 Republican convention is not just mathematically a pipe dream, it is suicide foe the effort to beat Obama!  Think about it.  Because the candidates have had to focus on each other (as well as all their supporters and the media) Obama has been receiving a free ride from the people who should be criticizing him the most.  Instead, each of our candidates have been repeatedly stripped and flogged before the public.  (In a way this is good, because it is airing out every possible negative ahead of the general and toughening the candidates.)  If this fight drags out to the beginning of September, as Gingrich hopes to do, Republicans will have barely two months to make their case to America why their heavily-contested nominee is better than the fully-Democrat-backed Obama.  Campaigns need time to sink in, and two months is simply not enough for a presidential campaign.  The longer this primary goes on the less chance we have of stopping Obama and all the things he plans on doing in his second term: a term that will not be bridled by a need to appear moderate to get re-elected. 

Consider that Romney not only has shrewdly been wining the winner-take-alls and the ignored islands , but he has also won the swing states that Republicans need to win in November while Santorum and Gingrich have only won the states that Rebpublicans are sure to win anyways.  Consider that Santorum and Romney have checkered pasts of years as Washington politicians, Romney is a successful businessman Washington-outsider.  Santorum focuses on Social issues.  While these are important, they will not win us this election.  Gingrich's baggage gives Obama and his media too much to work with.  Santorum himself considered Romney a conservative in 2008.  Only when he decided to enter the race did he change his tune.

Romney is our best hope to end Obamacare, anti-religious Obama dictates, prevent Cap-and-Trade, lower taxes, and restore our nation's economy.  Republicans, Conservatives, and right-minded moderates need to rise above the divisive campaign rhetoric and build the strong coalition we need!

Obama Impeachment Sought

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Obama's conducting of war by UN permission rather than congress, as demanded by the constitution,  constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors" claims one blogger and apparently at least two congressmen.  HE claims that articles of impeachment have already been created and presented in the House and Senate.



http://youtu.be/pkRcfy4t6CM

Ouch, Santorum!

Friday, March 9, 2012

"Look at their record!" Santorum told us.  Well, let's look at it.  This video was put out by the Gingrich campaign, but seems to support a Romney nomination more than the baggage-laden Gingrich.


 http://youtu.be/ELbCuLEe7Sw

It's About Beating Obama: Glenn Beck Urges Conservatives to Get Behind Romney

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Freedom Work's Matt Kibbe joins Glenn Beck to discuss the need or conservatives to put infighting aside and unite behind the only man who could now beat Obama. "I'm a Santorum fan, but it's about time for us to unite behind somebody now and build a machine that can take on Obama." "It's hard to figure out how someone other than Mitt Romney wins at this point."

CNN's Soledad O'Brien and Jay Thomas Look Like Fools for Taking on Breitbart's Joel Pollak

If you missed the hilarious efforts of  Soledad O'Brien and Thomas Pollak to defend Obama from the late Andrew Breitbart, watch here:



Daily Caller has uncovered more things that leave egg yolk on these two pathetic media spinners' faces:


 Wow. Breathe into a paper bag, Soledad.

But she’s not the best part. The best part is at the 6:30 mark, when comedian and radio host Jay Thomas asks Pollak, “What are you frightened of? Are you frightened that black people are gonna do something to you?”

I think Thomas might have nailed it. Here’s Pollak’s wife, Julia. (Hat tip: Hot Air)



I have a funny joke for you, Mr. Thomas. Feel free to use it:

“Take my wife. Please. I’m scared of her because she’s black!”


Update: Oh, or maybe this could be why Soledad was so upset:








Update: Will Jay Thomas and/or Soledad O’Brien be making an on-air apology to the Pollaks for calling Joel a racist? If not, why not?

Update: Prepare to gaze into the face of hatred:

By the way… Good catch, Joel!


Update: Rebelpundit asks: Was Soledad O’Brien Bailed Out by Producers on Critical Race Theory Definition? Well, considering she just kept repeating the first sentence of the top Google result for “critical race theory,” it’s a safe assumption that somebody was reading it into her earpiece. Just like in Broadcast News. Except back then they didn’t even have the Web.



I assume they do this all the time. I just wonder if anybody has failed as hard at it as Soledad did today.

Update: Last week she fell for that hoax about the evil bankster who left a 1% restaurant tip and wrote “Get a real job” on it. Did she ever correct that on the air? How are her ratings even as high as they are?

Update: It turns out Jay Thomas also had somebody talking into his earpiece during that segment:

"Critical Race Theory" Wikipedia Article Changed to Support CNN's Soledad O'Brien's New Politically-Correct Definition


The late Andrew Breitbart's first torpedo to the Obama re-election effort was unleashed last night in the form of a video from the president's Harvard years in which he asked students to "open up [their] hearts and their minds" to the words of his good friend Derrick Bell.  This Derrick Bell was a radical activist who advocated "Critical Race Theory."
If we did, here’s what we’d be opening our hearts and minds to. This is a close associate of Jeremiah Wright, a man who was quoted by Jeremiah Wright regularly. This is a man who posited that the civil rights movement was too moderate because it accepted the status quo, and believed that the entire legal and constitutional system had to be transformed in radical fashion. This is a man so extreme that, as we’ve reported, he wrote a story in 1993 in which he posited that white Americans would sell black Americans into slavery to aliens to relieve the national debt, and that Jews would go along with it.

CNN's Soledad O'Brien had a hilarious exchange with Breitbart.com's CEO Joel Pollak in which she and liberal guests tried to deflect the attack on Obama (as well as themselves for not properly vetting Obama) by calling Pollak racist, scared of Black people, and by inventing a new, benign definition of Critical Race Theory.

Apparently Soledad or her followers felt the need to back up her revised definition of "Critical Race Theory" by changing the Wikipedia article on the subject.  Too bad for them, conservatives have caught them in the act of deception:
In the version dated January 31, 2012, the words "white supremacy" and "racial power" appear.

Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which white supremacy and racial power are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process.
(Emphasis added.) However, the current version states the following:

Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which racial hierarchies are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process.
(Emphasis added.) You can see both versions on this page. If you go to the revision page, it looks like a little war broke out today, with edits and re-edits. One participant commented that it had obviously been changed to match "Soledad Obrien's empty-headed explanation on television last night."
Busted!

Even worse for the CNN reporter, it has been uncovered that Soledad O'Brien herself is a sympathizer of Obama's radical friend Derrick Bell from her past tweets.  Fair and Balanced?  Not at CNN... 

Soledad O'Brien could not have acted any more perfectly to prove Andrew Breitbart's point.

 

No Possible Way for Santorum or Gingrich to Win

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Dick Morris confirmed that it is now statistically impossible for Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich to win the Republican nomination: unless Romney drops dead there is no way for them to attain enough delegates.  The only thing they are accomplishing is preventing conservatives from focusing on ousting Obama until the convention in August.

THEY ARE GUARANTEEING THAT WE ONLY HAVE 2 MONTHS TO CREATE OUR CASE AGAINST PRESIDENT OBAMA. 

If this continues, we are certainly in for four more years of Obama, this time without any restraint, since he has no need to worry about what the American people think for another election.


After winning 6 states yesterday, Mitt has now won 11 of the last 15 races. And in the important battle for delegates, Mitt now has more than twice as many as Rick Santorum and four times more than Newt Gingrich.



And looking at the schedule ahead, the delegate math just doesn't add up for anyone but Mitt. Here are a few reasons why:

  • There's only one Super Tuesday. Yesterday was the other candidates' only real chance to stage any real comeback in the delegate race.
  • Only four of the remaining 34 state contests award their statewide delegates on a winner-take-all basis. And those four contests are all favorable for Mitt: Utah, New Jersey, Washington D.C., and Delaware.
  • Before Super Tuesday, nearly half of all contests were caucuses, but only seven of the remaining 34 contests are caucuses. Primaries require a strong national organization that Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich simply don't have.
As the other candidates attempt to ignore the basic principles of math, the only person's odds of winning they are increasing are Barack Obama's.

 
 
 

Save the Constitution

Declaration of Liberty

In memory of our God, our Nation, our Religions, our Freedom, our Peace, our Families and our Fallen Dead;

WE THE PEOPLE declare that We will Never Yield to those who would place us in bondage. We will live for the Constitution and we will die for the Constitution, for we know that it was inspired of God for all of his Children.


http://digitalnetworkarmy.com
 
Copyright © 2009-2010 Good Sense, All Rights Reserved.

Articles, quotes, comments, and images are the exclusive property of their respective authors, who own all rights to their use. Articles do not necessarily represent the views of Good Sense or its contributers. All copyrighted materials appearing on this site and not derived by contributing authors are protected by and used according to “Fair Use” as described in sections 107 through 118 of the U.S. Copyright Act (title 17, U. S. Code).