Janet Napolitano was alleged as "aiding and abetting" John M. Roll in a criminal conspiracy to "make an example" out of those who try to skirt federal regulations. An IRS audit case in the nineties makes a passionate plea against federal dictatorship and makes shocking allegations of constitutional infringements.
It wasn't the FBI, it was Napolitano who announced that Federal Judge John Roll was among those assassinated in today's shooting. In a very cursory statement she condemned the shooting as "senseless violence."
It could make sense that Roll was the target of today's shooting, because he received death threats. When he ruled that federal illegal immigrant lawsuits against ranch owners could proceed, "talk-radio shows cranked up the controversy and spurred audiences into making threats." Is this the conservative violence that Napolitano warned us all about?
But that was 11 months ago, so why the wait? Just 3 days ago Roll complained that Arizona's recently adopted streamlined method of dealing with illegal immigration is overburdening the judicial system, causing a "judicial emergency.' He sought "permission to delay bringing felons to trial" His crusade against state involvement in illegal immigration continued right until his murder.
So maybe some extremist conservative saw this, decided it's the final straw and wanted him gone? Not so fast! Consider that Napolitano was state governor until recently, when she left to become Obama's Big Sister. She famously slammed Arizona's new immigration law and falsely claimed Arizona's border "is more secure than it has ever been." Many conservatives complained that she turned on state and state's rights and now is a proponent of federal rights. But a court case reveals she teamed up with John Roll long before to diminish states rights.
She was involved in an IRS tax lien against New Life Health Center. New Life was targeted for $4 million after they had placed assets into foreign trusts. “They are conservative Republicans who are active in their community and care about the future of our Country.” A FOIA request determined that a Federal Grand Jury teamed up with the IRS and the US Attorney, violating the 4th amendment. But a Judge ruled the federal government has “sovereign immunity.” The US Attorney refused to settle and allegedly told them:
“This is not an issue of money (Dr. Burns), this is a power issue. We intent on putting you and your Company out of business to make you an example.”
Complaints and lawsuits against the government were thrown out. Counsel filed a FOIA for proof of jurisdiction for the federal government, and when the gov couldn't produce anything, they declared this shows "the 'Application of the United States of America' appears to be fraudulent on its face" and claimed: " a criminal conspiracy of federal officers, employees, and agents in the instant case."
The company made a passionate plea for State’s rights and against federal dictatorship.
It went to the 9th Circuit, and they sent “all books and records” to the the Grand Jury in response to a subpoena. This never reached the court, however, as it was all stolen in the mail. A total of 27 pleadings were stolen from the mail. The Counsel made a criminal complaint against Judge John Roll and Janet Napolitano for “obstruction of justice, jury tampering, perjury, bribery, and conspiracy.” The complaint states “John M. Roll admitted, on the official court record, that he had intercepted” a request for investigation to the Grand Jury that never arrived, along with all other pleadings. The FBI refused to investigate.
“We count 27 counts of mail fraud, 27counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice,
and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above, committed by a conspiracy of persons
including, but not limited to, John M.Roll, Janet Napolitano, Robert L. Miskell, and
The complaint against Napolitano says she aided John Roll in these criminal acts of obstruction:
Ms. Janet Napolitano with:
(1) aiding and abetting the obstruction of correspondence
transmitted via first class, certified, and registered
United States Mail, under color of law (25 counts), in
violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702;
(2) aiding and abetting the act of tampering with a federal
grand jury (25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and
(3) aiding and abetting obstruction of criminal investigations
(25 counts), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510;
(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law,
specifically the Right to Petition a lawfully convened
federal grand jury for a formal investigation (25 counts),
in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242;
(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above (25 counts), in
violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371.