Associated Press Report Shows Gun Aimed At American Flag

Monday, June 28, 2010

The Associated Press now gets its news from Iran's state media. Press TV led with the headline "US high court expands gun rights", and AP later gave the headline "Justices extend gun owner rights nationwide." The articles are pretty much identical:

PressTV- "All individuals across the United State will possess a constitutional right to bear arms regardless of their state or city laws banning firearms."

AP- "The Supreme Court held Monday that Americans have the right to own a gun for self-defense anywhere they live, expanding the conservative court's embrace of gun rights since John Roberts became Chief Justice.

AP's article is even more biased, as it slams the "conservative" court and more specifically John Roberts. The next sentence is very similar:
PressTV- "The US Supreme Court ruled by a 5-4 margin on Monday to restrict the jurisdiction of state and city governments to impose controls on gun ownership."

AP- "By a 5-4 vote, the justices cast doubt on handgun bans in the Chicago area, but signaled that some limitations on the Constitution's "right to keep and bear arms" could survive legal challenges."

AP then diverges to tell us the good news, that the Court says colleges can now ban Christian clubs from restricting gay members.

Iran's image accompanying the article shows a handgun pointed left to the stars (which represent states of the union) and the constitution below it with the caption "to keep and bear arms." Associated Press likewise shows a handgun, this time held, being aimed at the flag's stars (which represent states of the union) and the Supreme Court building below it.

Is the message "guns are now free to destroy our states?" Iran reports the ruling is a "blow to efforts to reduce the role of firearms in American life." They point out "On the average, 80 people are killed in the US daily in gun-related incidents, 34 of them in homicides."

AP is even more explicit, as they give the quote: Monday's decision "could prove far more destructive — quite literally — to our nation's communities and to our constitutional structure."

BBC, MSNBC and Chicago Tribune published images with the title of guns aimed at the viewer. Such a striking image will make any viewer nervous.

MSNBC's video report showed AK-47s, an assault weapon not a handgun, as the reporter read: "Now already gun rights owners... uh, gun rights advocates are saying that they will go on to challenge other laws, laws restricting carrying, laws restricting where you can take a gun, laws that require people to register guns, all that sort of thing."

Nobody is suggesting legalizing assault weapons across America, but that is the clear message from MSNBC here.

Newsbusters makes the great point that gun rights weren't "extended" at allas these media headlines suggest. The court found that local laws violated the 2nd and 14th Amendments to the federal Constitution. Not the same thing.

California Welfare ATMs Used At Indian Casinos

Thursday, June 24, 2010

LA Times broke this story on more ridiculous waste in California spending.


Al Qaeda Threats Now Delivered by Former American Jew

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Thanks to our apologizing president the threat of Islamo-terrorism on American soil is greater than ever. And now we don't just have crazy cave dwellers threatening us . . . but American-born self-haters. We need to vote statesmen into office who understand the threat of terrorism and will take necessary action to keep us safe.

Just a few years ago---any communication to the u-s from al queda involved a grainy video of osama bin laden, shot outside of a cave somewhere in the pakistan or afghanistan hills---the lanky terrorists leader would spout his venom against the u-s in arabic, a rifle at his side. Arab interpreters would deliver the non specific message, u-s anti terrorist forces would raise the national terror alert, but nothing ever seemed to happen.

Now things have changed. Bin laden hasn’t been heard from in a while. Reports say he may be ill or he may be dead. But in the past year or two al queda’s m-o has changed. Now, instead of saudi rebels like bin laden, the mouth piece of al queda is an american born jihadist named adam ghadan…who…with the exception of the fl0wing white robe and turban looks and sounds like a typical american college student…but in his latest rant….the new al queda mouth piece speaks in specifics…mocking barack obama as a weak leader….and noting how recent election victories by republicans have eroded his power….and he warns that more attacks from the muslim dark side will be coming…unless the u-s ends it’s military operations in muslim lands….code words for afghanistan and iraq….

Gahdan…was born jewish….he played little league in southern california…was home schooled---but somewhere…down the line he became first a muslim and then a radical muslim….home grown terrorism is a big concern…besides ghadahn who fled to the middle east 6 years ago….there is a growing roster of terrorists who were either born here or assimilated here…like nidal hissan…the american born doctor who allegedly shot up fort hood, killing 13 people….and faisal shah zad the hate filled would be bomber who admits to trying to blow up an s-u-v in times square….other plots to spew terror in ny and dallas where broken up before the bloody missions could be carried out.

Lucky for ny shah zad wasn’t much of a craftsman when it came to bomb making….but there may be more skilled operatives out there….whats really scary about shazad is the fact that he managed to attend a pakistani training camp….and brought large amounts of cash into the u-s without raising as much as an eyebrow among u-s anti terrorism authorities….in court yesterday----faisal shahzad gleefully admitted his guilt and seemed undaunted by the possibility of spending the rest of his life in federal prison….guys with a mindset like that will be hard to stop….and there may be more than a few of them out there….

[Crane's Corner]

New York Times' 10 Huge Lies In Attack Piece On Mormons

Monday, June 21, 2010

The liberal media is in full attack mode, as NYT, Boston Globe, LA Times, and Salt Lake Tribune join hundred of other liberal media in spreading bigoted lies about the Mormon church because of their support for Proposition 8. The federal court is on the brink of overturning the state constitution, and concurrently the liberal propaganda film "8: The Mormon Proposition" seeks to place full blame for Proposition 8 on Mormons.

Today, the New York Times pushes this Nazi tactic to new hateful levels, placing full blame on Mormons for making California the "first state in the United States to take rights away from people by changing its constitution." (Lie #1) That's pretty ironic since Mormons were the first group in the history of the United States who had their rights to marry taken away by a the Supreme Court changing the constitution.

Reed Cowan’s polemical film “8: The Mormon Proposition” examines the successful campaign against gay marriage in California that was heavily financed by the Church [Lie #2] of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which is implacably opposed to homosexuality. [Lie #3]

The Church financed very little, and no tithing money went to the cause. Aside from the grammatical errors in this sentence, it is completely the opposite of what the New York Times reported last year:
...on Wednesday, the church was being praised by gay rights activists in Salt Lake City, citadel of the Mormon world, for its open support of a local ordinance banning discrimination against gay men and lesbians in housing and employment.

Doesn't look like implacable opposition to me.
The degree to which money influences politics is suggested by the passage of Proposition 8... [Lie #4]

Never mind that anti-Proposition 8 gay activists actually spent more. That would actually mean that money doesn't influence politics... since it managed to pass...
Gay marriages that took place between June 16, 2008, and Nov. 5, 2008, remain legally recognized and retain full state-level marriage rights... Tyler Barrick and Spencer Jones, a gay couple from Mormon backgrounds, who married in San Francisco in June 2008 and were devastated to find their marriage legally delegitimized.

Um. Contradiction much? (Lie #5)
It uncovers the classified church documents and the largely concealed money trail [Lie #6] of Mormon contributions that paid for a high-powered campaign to pass Proposition 8. The Mormon involvement, the film persuasively argues, tilted the vote [Lie #7] toward passage, by 52 percent to 48 percent, in its final weeks.

Have people forgotten the blacklist propagated by the liberal media and California state against Mormons? If one thing is clear here, it's that Mormon donors have been outed, leading to violent attacks, vandalism, and terrorism. It is the height of ridiculous to say financing by Mormons was covered up. Proposition 8 won by a huge margin, more than Obama's victory as president. There was no tilting, sorry.
That involvement was concealed under the facade of a coalition with Roman Catholics and evangelical Christians called the National Organization for Marriage. [Lie #8]

So the involvement of other religions was imagined? What about San Francisco's shakedown of the Catholic Church in retaliation for their support of Proposition 8?
...homosexuality, which one church elder calls “contrary to God’s plan.” Chris Buttars, a proudly homophobic [Lie #9] Utah state senator, compared male coupling to bestiality.

Chris Buttars is not proudly homophobic, in fact the film makers tricked him into giving those statements. He is a wacky politician. He sponsored an Intelligent Design bill and he tried to abolish 12th grade. NYT illogically associates him with the Mormon church as they try to call all things Utah as Mormons. The church made it very clear after Buttar's comments: "From the outset, the Church's position has always been to engage in civil and respectful dialogue on this issue. Senator Buttars does not speak for the church."

New York Times finishes with one final lie:
In the meantime the struggle to repeal Proposition 8 is under way.

When a judge rules something unconstitutional, that would be overturn, not repeal. Repeal is when you vote something out. Though, how can the constitution be deemed unconstitutional? You tell me.

Liberal Gay Federal Judge Hints He Will Overthrow Proposition 8

Prop. 8 trial: Judge troubled by lack of evidence from defense

The federal judge hearing the double-jeopardy case against Proposition 8 U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, is gay and close friend to San Francisco gay politicians. Judge Walker ruled in favor of "gay rights" in previous case.

In 2005, Walker ruled against Oakland city employees who posted fliers promoting "natural family, marriage and family values." Walker wrote in his decision that the government should push "significant interests in restricting discriminatory speech about homosexuals. . . . a duty under state law to prevent workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation."

In 1999, he threw out a case against a boy whose teacher made "pro-gay comments" in the classroom (I can't find anywhere exactly what those comments were.)

But don't worry! After he overturns the people's vote, it's on to the ultra-liberal Ninth Circuit Court!

Proof GOP tried to stop the Financial breakdown & Democrats obstructed

Friday, June 18, 2010

Previously... Freddie Mac Outsources Servicing To India, Fresh Financial Meltdown Begin

How Did This Guy Win The Primaries?

Monday, June 14, 2010

Alvin Greene of South Carolina:

Illegal Immigrant Traffic Stop in Arizona

You have to be pretty clueless to put you and your girlfriend's photo on your driver's license. Thanks to their new law, police officers in Arizona could now report this guy to ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to get him deported. In other states, their have to turn a blind eye.

Lest you think illegal immigration is a victimless crime, remember:

  • Illegal aliens are involved in criminal activities at a rate that is 2-5 times their representative proportion of the population.
  • Illegal aliens commit between 700,000 to 1,289,000 or more crimes per year.
  • Illegal aliens commit at least 2,158 murders each year – a number that represents three times greater participation than their proportion of the population.
  • Illegal alien sexual predators commit an estimated 130,909 sexual crimes each year.
  • There may be as many as 240,000 illegal alien sex offenders circulating throughout America. Based on studies, they will commit an average of 8 sex crimes per perpetrator before being caught.
  • In Los Angeles, alone, 95% of some 1,500 outstanding warrants for homicides are for illegal aliens. About 67% of the 17,000 outstanding fugitive felony warrants are for illegal aliens.
  • About 60% of the crimes being committed are by illegal aliens who were previously deported.
  • Over 25% of today's federal prison population are illegal aliens.

Here is a detailed example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for any state at any time.

You have 2 families... "Joe Legal" and "Joe Illegal."

Each family has 2 parents and 2 children.

"Joe Legal" works in construction, has a Social Security Number, and makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted.

"Joe Illegal" also works in construction, has "NO" Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table."

Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours $1000.00 per week, $52,000 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax and Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.

Joe Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year. Joe Illegal pays no taxes so Joe Illegal now has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays Medical and Dental Insurance with limited coverage. $1000.00 per month, $12,000.00 per year.

Joe Legal now has $19,231.00.

Joe Illegal has full Medical and Dental coverage through the state and local clinics at no personal cost per year, so Joe Illegal still has $31,200.00. If Joe Illegal can’t get a convenient appointment at the doctor’s office, he and his Illegal family just use the local Emergency Rooms as their primary care providers since they are not going to pay anyway.

Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for Food Stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays for food, $1,000.00 per month, $12,000.00 per year, which leaves Joe Legal with $7,231.00.

Joe Illegal has no documented income and is therefore eligible for Food Stamps and Welfare.

Joe Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays rent of $1,000.00 per month, $12,000.00 per year. Joe Legal is now in the hole by $4,769.00.

Joe Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy so he only pays $500.00 per month out-of-pocket towards his rent, $6,000.00 per year. This leaves Joe Illegal with a balance of $25,200.00 in illegally obtained and untaxed cash.

Joe Legal has to work overtime on Saturdays or get a part time job after work just to make ends meet.

Joe Illegal has plenty of cash on hand and has his nights and weekends off to enjoy with his illegal family and friends.

Joe Legal's and Joe Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's book rental, lunches, and other fees while Joe Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch and other fees are subsidized or completely waived.

Joe Illegal's children have an after school ESL program.

Joe Legal's children go home.

Joe Legal and Joe Illegal both enjoy the same Police, Fire, and other Government Services.

Joe Legal paid for these services while Joe Illegal did not pay anything.


Do not vote for or support any politician who supports illegal aliens.

Make it a point to know how your representatives vote, both State and Federal

The time is long overdue to take a stand for America and Americans!

Hawaii Elections Clerk: Obama Has No Birth Certificate

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Here's the article

Related... Obama tells Egyptian Minister he is Muslim

LA High School Teachers Take Students on Field Trip to Arizona to Protest Immigration Law

Friday, June 11, 2010

First elementary school students are taken to a lesbian wedding, now high schoolers are bussed to Arizona to protest their new tough law outlawing illegal immigration? When did California teachers start thinking it's okay to indoctrinate their students with radical liberal ideologies? How are Californians (who voted down gay marriage) okay with their kids being turned into liberal activists at school? What the heck is going on in California?!!

Standing in front of a wall-to-wall mural featuring a who's who of revolutionaries, including Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro and Che Guevara, and boldly displaying the motto Patria o Muerte, Venceremos!!! (Fatherland or Death, We Shall Overcome!!!), a group of teachers, students, parents and community activists in the Los Angeles Unified School District gathered last month for an unusual field trip — to Arizona, to protest that state's controversial immigration law.

A video posted on YouTube shows LA social studies teacher Jose Lara interviewing teachers and students on May 28 at the headquarters of an organization calling for a Mexican revolution on U.S. soil. Soon after he shot the video, many in the group left for an overnight "freedom ride" to Phoenix to protest what Lara tells the camera is a "racist and outrageous" law.

Four days later, the school board president implored the superintendent of schools to ensure that students in the district be taught that Arizona's law is "un-American" and Jim Crow-like. The law, passed in April, empowers law enforcement officials to question the immigration status of people they think may be in the country illegally.

Lara, who made the video, teaches at the Unified School District's Santee Education Complex with Ron Gochez, another social studies teacher who came under fire last month after he was identified making incendiary remarks in a widely circulated YouTube video that shows him speaking at a 2007 rally for La Raza, a revolutionary group calling for Mexican revolt inside the United States.

In that video, Gochez referred to Americans as "frail, racist, white people, and to California as "stolen, occupied Mexico." The video's posting led to a groundswell of anger and a flood of calls for Gochez's firing, but a school district investigation found him fit to continue teaching history to public school students.

Keep reading the article]

Want to let the school district know how you feel about their brain-washing of youth?
Ramon C. Cortines
Superintendent of Schools

Office of the Superintendent
333 S. Beaudry Ave., 24th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Mailing Address
P.O. Box 3307
Los Angeles, CA 90051
Tel: 213-241-7000
Fax: 213-241-8442

What has Jerry Brown done to you?

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

What has Jerry Brown done? Well, as governor of California he called for billions in new taxes. As mayor, he successfully pushed for taxes on everything from parking to burglar alarms. What with all the taxes that Jerry Brown has raised over his lifetime of holding elected office, it would stand to reason that he would know a little bit about how to spend the money. Unfortunately, that’s not entirely accurate. He knows a lot about how to spend it. A little too much.

Wouldn’t it be great to have a law written just for you so you could keep secrets? Well, Jerry Brown’s got just such a law, and so he’s not telling you what he was up to while he was the governor the last time. Not until 2038. That’s what Jerry Brown has done to you.

Jerry Brown has invoked the “Jerry Brown Law” to block release of his documents!

Brown has decided that you do not have the right or ability to access and read the documents related to his two terms as governor. Because of a change made for him in California law, almost all of Brown’s records were concealed from public view for 50 years – until 2038! – unless he decides it’s okay for you to look at them. Considering that documents from the President of the United States are concealed for only 12 years – and in some cases only 5 – Brown’s unwillingness to release these papers seem a little odd.

Jerry Brown: Ultimate Insider from Republican Governors Association on Vimeo.

Sign the petition asking Jerry Brown to release his records so we can see what all he has done to the people of California.


Sabatoge? BP Chief & Gold. Sachs Sold Stock Just Before Oil Spill

Saturday, June 5, 2010

As for whether BP's top paid politician, Obama, was involved, he has been doing nothing for months, so it's hard to argue that he was caught off guard.

British Petroleum Chief Tony Haward sold £1.4 million of stock just before the Gulf spill and the subsequent stock plunge.

Goldman Sachs sold $250 million of stock just before the spill.

For some reason the world's top engineers at BP have been unable to deal with a simple oil leak, which happens all the time. And why was such a major oil rig, which has been perfected with back-up systems and more back-up systems, so incredibly faulty that this happened in the first place?


Save the Constitution

Declaration of Liberty

In memory of our God, our Nation, our Religions, our Freedom, our Peace, our Families and our Fallen Dead;

WE THE PEOPLE declare that We will Never Yield to those who would place us in bondage. We will live for the Constitution and we will die for the Constitution, for we know that it was inspired of God for all of his Children.
Copyright © 2009-2010 Good Sense, All Rights Reserved.

Articles, quotes, comments, and images are the exclusive property of their respective authors, who own all rights to their use. Articles do not necessarily represent the views of Good Sense or its contributers. All copyrighted materials appearing on this site and not derived by contributing authors are protected by and used according to “Fair Use” as described in sections 107 through 118 of the U.S. Copyright Act (title 17, U. S. Code).